Right or wrong: loan transfers and lender flexibility

Author: | Published: 5 Mar 2018

Are recent trends restricting loan transfers reasonable or an unnecessary fetter on lender flexibility?

1 Minute read
There has been a lot of recent tension between borrowers and lenders on transfer provisions in loan agreements.

Borrowers are increasingly seeking tighter restrictions on transfers by lenders. This article considers whether new restrictions being imposed on the transferability of loans are reasonable or an unnecessary constraint on the trading of loans.

It also addresses the concept of deemed consent, when consent can be withheld or delayed, and some recent trends and statistics for transfer restrictions and sub-participations.

Transfer and assignment provisions in English law loan agreements are often hotly negotiated. There has recently been an increasing encroachment by borrowers on these provisions.

Historically, many loan agreements required borrower consultation only (as opposed to consent) for assignments or transfers by lenders of loan participations. The current Loan Market Association (LMA) form for leveraged...



close Register today to read IFLR's global coverage

Get unlimited access to IFLR.com for 7 days*, including the latest regulatory developments in the global financial sector, updated daily.

  • Deal Analysis
  • Expert Opinion
  • Best Practice


*all IFLR's global coverage published in the last 3 months.

Read IFLR's global coverage whenever and wherever you want for 7 days with IFLR mobile app for iPad and iPhone

"The format of the Review has changed over the years; the high quality of its substantive content has not."
Lee C Buchheit, Cleary Gottlieb